2) Sophia Loren's role as Mamma in Nine is also extremely telling. She often starred with Marcello Mastroianni (for example in Una Giornata Particolare (A Special Day) (1974)) and, while Mastroianni himself doesn't appear in Nine, the character he personified in 8 1/2 (Guido) does. Thus, even though Sophia Loren was not in 8 1/2, her connection to Mastroianni helps her serve as a credible matriarch of Nine, rightly named Mamma.
3) The usage of the number 9 in Nine has two notable meanings that I have found so far. First, 8 1/2 was Fellini's ninth film. The fact that this film uses the nearest whole number after 8 1/2 as its title suggests that Fellini's earlier version is now complete. (Fellini even ends 8 1/2 with a large dance circle, demonstrating not only the importance of grandeur, but also the symbolism embedded in the circle, a representation of the cyclical nature of life and its absurdities. Even creating this Part Two of 8 1/2 shows that events and people often come full circle.) Second, Guido is 9 years old when he appears in flashbacks.
4) Despite the fact that Nicole Kidman does not play a major role in Nine, she bears a striking resemblance to Anita Ekberg, the Swedish actress who dramatically splashed around in the Trevi Fountain in La Dolce Vita (1960), flirting with Marcello Mastroianni (playing a character named Marcello) and declaring, "Marcello, come here!" Nine has Kidman occupying a similar role (even with a fountain in the background at one point) with this Guido (not played by Marcello...is this confusing yet?).
6) Another throwback to Fellini, Kate Hudson (as Stephanie, a film critic) says, "Every frame is like a postcard." This one-liner would bring any Fellini fan back to 1952's Lo Sceicco Bianco (The White Sheik),
7) Fellini often liked to include a picture within a picture -- or, in other words, people within his broader movie also participating in the watching of a production. Nine director Rob Marshall preserved this characteristic and had the "inner movie" also titled Nine, thereby making the audience wonder which one was the actual production, the broader story or the story within the story.
8) In Nine, Nicole Kidman's and Daniel Day-Lewis' characters are zooming out of Cinecitta in Day-Lewis' car, reminiscent of a sequence depicted in Fellini's 1972 film Roma [starting in this clip at 2:06]. It could be interpreted in a number of ways (such as a beginning or end of a chapter). [Something interesting to note is that as they are driving out of Cinecitta to escape the paparazzi, they pass by promotional posters of Australia, Nicole Kidman's 2008 film with Hugh Jackman, clearly having nothing to do with Fellini's work, although a subtlety that Fellini himself may have even opted to include.]
9) At the end of 8 1/2, the audience is given access to the other side of the displays -- the back of the backdrop, if you will -- thus showing that behind every spectacle, there is an extravagant set-up, and that everything is perfectly orchestrated in order to create a final product. Fellini plays with that idea because he doesn't let his viewers know the difference between the set-up and the product. Maybe in that way, he makes everything the set-up and everything the product. In Nine, toward the end of the movie (no spoiler ahead), the audience can see the breakdown of the set in a very similar fashion.
10) In addition to the aforementioned, Nine pays homage to Fellini in other unobtrusive ways. While the cameras pan past the outside of Cinecitta (a major film studio in Rome), they show a car pulling up to Soundstage 5. This soundstage, located on the grounds of Cinecitta, was Fellini's favorite, and was even named in his honor after he died in 1993, adopting the name Teatro Federico Fellini (see page 180 of this book (as well as the other pages, too) for more of the inside scoop).
----------
When I set out to write this blog, I didn't mean for it to come out as a film review. (If it did, I apologize; I never trust other people's film reviews since everyone has different tastes in movies and also judges them based on varying criteria, so by no means to I wish to impart my own assessment of the movie.) I just wanted to highlight several items that I noticed and to invite you to comment on other parallels I may not have identified here. In watching a movie, there is so much more that goes into it than storyline, actors, etc. -- in this case, it was all of this film's intricacies that would go unrecognized by a non-Fellini-phile that, to me, made it a nine.
1 comment:
Maybe I'll comment intelligently after I see the film. But you've done such a great job with this post, maybe I don't have to see it. Thanks for the visuals in the blog. You're not only a great writer, but also an illustrator!!
Post a Comment